Source: Lew Rockwell | VIEW ORIGINAL POST ==>
From the Tom Woods Letter:
Over on Twitter/X I’ve made my opinions clear on several egregiously bad Trump appointments, all in foreign policy — it looks like Miriam Adelson got her wish list.
If you’re not following me there, that’s easy to fix by clicking here: @ThomasEWoods
Since I’ve written about all that over there, let me say a quick something about Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence and Matt Gaetz as Attorney General.
Tulsi is said to be “unqualified” because she doesn’t come from the existing cabal of liars and propagandists who have never told the American public the truth in their lives.
Rep. Abigail Spanberger in particular is horrified at the prospect that our intelligence world might not bombard us 24 hours a day with lies that would insult a second grader:
As a former CIA case officer, I saw the men and women of the U.S. intelligence community put their lives on the line every day for this country — and I am appalled at the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard to lead DNI.
Not only is she ill-prepared and unqualified, but she traffics [sic] in conspiracy theories and cozies up to dictators like Bashar-al Assad and Vladimir Putin.
As a Member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am deeply concerned about what this nomination portends for our national security.
Rep. Spanberger is a “former CIA case officer,” which means we should favor the opposite of whatever she says.
She claims to be concerned about “conspiracy theories,” when it was contractors with her beloved CIA who spun the absurd theory that Russia had come up with the story about Hunter Biden’s laptop (honestly, if you’re going to pretend a foreign power invented a story, make it not as weird and random as “the president’s son had a laptop with stuff on it”).
She is deeply worried about someone who “cozies up to dictators” — the CIA would never do that! It just installs them.
Here’s what our friend Dave Smith had to say about the present situation:
A lot of crazy things have happened in this country over the last few years, so you may have forgotten this one minor story from eight years ago:
The US intelligence agencies framed the sitting US President for treason. They all knew that Donald Trump wasn’t involved in a conspiracy with the Russians, but they lied.
Well, that President is back AND the boss of the Intelligence agencies is now, not only someone completely outside of that conspiracy, but someone who was slandered with that same accusation, by the same nasty woman whose campaign came up with the whole Trump frame job to begin with.
Interesting times.
As for Matt Gaetz, they really don’t like him. John Bolton says Gaetz “must be the worst nomination for a cabinet position in American history.” National Review Online has a predictable article against him.
JD Vance snapped back:
The main issue with Matt Gaetz is that he used his office to prosecute his political opponents and authorized federal agents to harass parents who were peacefully protesting at school board meetings.
Oh wait, that’s actually Merrick Garland, the current attorney general.
They’re appalled that the attorney general isn’t being chosen from D.C. swampdom, because that’s what they’ve come to expect. But John F. Kennedy didn’t do that, and neither did Ronald Reagan.
If Gaetz gets in, I do believe he will cut the legs out from under the giant lawfare operation that has grown up around his office in recent years — and this, rather than genuine concerns about his qualifications (these people care about qualifications all of a sudden?) is what the people screaming about him are actually worried about.
